

The cost of the Iraq war sky rocketed up to $1 trillion. Congress can do its job by holding President Bush accountable for runaway expenses. Democrats are now in control of the war and have not done much better than the Republicans did in the past. Public opinion and the Constitution are on the side of Democrats willing to demand answers to how the money will be spent and the results to be expected. For this budget, President Bush originally requested $150 billion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That was on top of the $460 billion to fund the rest of the Department of Defense. Now the president is back, three weeks after the start of the new fiscal year, demanding another $42 billion, mostly for the Iraq war. By one account it is $42.3 billion and others have it at $46 billion. The difference may involve taking part out of the funds funneled for North Korea, the Palestinians and similar efforts. On one level, the numbers are like the estimates of the weekly cost of the Iraq war. It's $2 billion or $3 billion. The common thread is, every penny is borrowed. Democrats outrage over the Iraq war turns timid in the face of White House rhetoric that their opponents are weak on national defense. Squandering money that does not make the country any safer is hardly resolute leadership. Congress and the Democrats are on safe ground expressing incredulity. They are supposed to defend the treasury from intemperate, profligate executives. They have the weight and authority that go with the power of the purse. Asking tough questions is their duty. The challenge feels awkward because Congress is out of practice. Saying "no" and meaning it is part of the job description.

